Around town, however, the Highlander feels a little quicker to respond from when you put your foot on the accelerator to when the vehicle begins to move. In Edmunds’ testing, these SUVs accelerated from 0 to 60 mph in 7.5 seconds, which is an average time for this class of vehicle. Both have a standard V6 engine that provides about 290 horsepower, and both offer optional all-wheel drive. The Kia Telluride and Toyota Highlander are essentially neck and neck in regard to performance specifications. The maximum cargo capacity with the second and third rows stowed leans back in favor of the Telluride’s 87 cubic feet to the Highlander’s 84.3 cubic feet. The advantage swaps if you fold those third-row seats down the Toyota can hold 48.4 cubic feet to the Kia’s 46 cubic feet. That’s enough of a difference to allow you to fit the equivalent of a couple extra carry-on suitcases in the Telluride. The Telluride can hold up to 21 cubic feet behind its third row, while the Highlander is limited to 16 cubic feet. The materials quality feels slightly better in the Telluride, with a higher-grade leather and more consistent craftsmanship. Both have easy-to-use controls it’s just that the Telluride is a little more stylish going about it. In the Highlander, the rearmost passengers - particularly if they are adults - will feel cramped in comparison.Īs for interior design, Edmunds experts find the Telluride’s dashboard more cohesive-looking than the Highlander’s. The Telluride’s third-row seat has more comfortable padding and a higher seat cushion height. The big difference in this category comes down to third-row seating. Go this route and you get second-row seats that are almost as comfortable as the front seats. Both SUVs seat up to eight passengers or seven people if you opt for the available second-row captain’s chairs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |